Periodic Or Emergency, Maintenance Duty Goes On Almost the Same Flow

Tuesday, May 24, 2011
In the article "Maintenance Duty Certainly Is A Flow", we have introduced simple maintenance duty workflow.

But just think about what made you inspect? Of course periodical does, but also External notification such as claims and tip-offs. It's convenient setting up Workflow to start automatically when receiving Inspection Data.

<Tasks>
1. Inspection Point, 2. Inspection Date, 3. Operation of Inspection Report, 4. Repair Date, 5. Operation of Repair Report, 6.Confirmation


[Maintenance Duty-Receive Inspection Data:[2. Inspection Date] screen]


<Items>
  • Title<<Point>>
-Inspection Point-
  • inspection Point on GoogleMap(string)
  • Ideal Inspection On (date)
  • Summary of Inspection(string: text box 3 lines)
  • Correspondence (discussion)
-Inspection Report-
  • Schedule Inspection On (date)
  • Inspected On (date)
  • Photo Inspecting (file)
  • Inspection Report (string: text box 3 lines)
  • Judgment (select:Need to be Repaired/No Need to be Repaired)
-Repair Report-
  • Schedule Repair On (date)
  • Repaired On (date)
  • Photo Repairing (file)
  • Repair Report (string: text box 3 lines)

In Workflow model above, [1. Inspection Point] have already inputted before office worker starts. So he can pass to next process right away just by visual confirmation.
However, there's a possibility of piling up at [1. Inspection Point]. If each data that sent to is reliable enough, it's good to start from Task [2. Inspection Date] as shown below.

<Tasks>
1. Inspection Point, 2. Inspection Date, 3. Operation of Inspection Report, 4. Repair Date, 5. Operation of Repair Report, 6.Confirmation


<Added Items>
None